The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...

"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...

Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

The ruling is ideologically neutral and will apply when Republicans are in the minority and a Democrat occupies the White ...

テキサス州など共和党支持の傾向が強い２８州では今後、現地で生まれても米国国籍を与えられない可能性がある。ただしマサチューセッツ・カリフォルニアなど民主党傾向の強い２２州とワシントンＤＣでは不法滞留や一時滞留外国人の子供といっても既存のように市民権を受ける「出生市民権」制度が有効だ。 米連邦最高裁判所は２７日（現地時間）、各州の連邦判事が下した仮処分決定は、全国単位の効力がないと判断し、トランプ政権 ...

Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.

OP-ED. Public law professor Julien Jeanneney voices concern over the recent elimination by the highest court in the United ...

The ‘Fox News Sunday’ panel discusses the Supreme Court’s major decision on the legality of nationwide injunctions and more.

The US Supreme Court has ruled on Friday that judges on federal courts lack the authority to grant what is known as nationwide injunctions. President Donald Trump has had one after another of his ...

West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey fires back at backlash against the Supreme Court's ruling limiting nationwide injunctions on 'The Story.' ...

Today's Supreme Court ruling barring nationwide injunctions could empower the federal government to engage in large-scale violations of the Constitution. Exactly how bad the consequences will be ...